Find Marc
online.

I want to talk about an ad you have probably seen.

Fire your marketing agency. Replace them with AI. Twenty dollars a month.

I am not going to tell you that ad is wrong. Sometimes it is completely right.

There are law firm marketing agencies operating right now that you ...should absolutely stop paying. And if you have one of those, the sooner you figure that out the better.

But there are also law firm marketing agencies doing work that AI cannot replicate. And the attorneys who fire those agencies based on a Facebook ad are going to feel very smart for about six months. Then the pipeline dries up and they spend the next two years trying to rebuild what they had.

The first video is always the hardest.

Every attorney who ends up with a strong video presence says the same thing about getting started. Awkward setup. Bad lighting. They hate how they sound on playback. They redo it four times and publish the least bad one.

But they do it. They ...get through the first one. The second is easier. By the fourth or fifth they have found something close to their rhythm.

And then they stop.

Not because the videos were bad. Because three months later trial prep absorbed two weeks, a client emergency filled another, and the recording session never got rescheduled.

Six videos. Last upload four months ago.

This is not a discipline problem. It is an architecture problem.

The traditional model for attorney video requires the attorney to periodically stop practicing law and sit in front of a camera. That requirement is incompatible with how law firms actually run.

Video is the most powerful trust-building tool available in legal marketing today. The attorneys who build a consistent presence pull away from competitors in ways that are very hard to replicate.

This video is about why the traditional model always breaks and what the architecture that actually works looks like.